<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for comicstripclub.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicstripclub.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicstripclub.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by maryrose</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>maryrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>Hey, Hap. I thought it was funny. And poignant in a way.

Happy Thanksgiving!

I'm thankful for my wonderful husband, my beautiful baby boy, my supportive family and in-laws, financial stability in an instable time, a working car, food on my table, and friends who genuinely value my friendship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Hap. I thought it was funny. And poignant in a way.</p>
<p>Happy Thanksgiving!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thankful for my wonderful husband, my beautiful baby boy, my supportive family and in-laws, financial stability in an instable time, a working car, food on my table, and friends who genuinely value my friendship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by TheKipper</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4139</link>
		<dc:creator>TheKipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4139</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  It's funny how many accusations Hapajap gets for being intolerant, yet he takes the time to read and respond to and WELCOME dissenting opinions.  Imagine how tiny these comment pages would be if he were the monstrous extremist he's so often made out to be.  I mean really, how many humorists/satirists are willing to have real discussions and not just ridicule the opposition.  He's not some Bill Mahr type (apologies to any fans) who is more interested in making his oppostion look stupid than having an honest chat, otherwise we would be seeing the "you suck, I rock" kinda crap that Hapa seems to carefully avoid.

Yeah, I gotta give you kudos, Hapa.  For all the heat you take, you remain a gentleman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  It&#8217;s funny how many accusations Hapajap gets for being intolerant, yet he takes the time to read and respond to and WELCOME dissenting opinions.  Imagine how tiny these comment pages would be if he were the monstrous extremist he&#8217;s so often made out to be.  I mean really, how many humorists/satirists are willing to have real discussions and not just ridicule the opposition.  He&#8217;s not some Bill Mahr type (apologies to any fans) who is more interested in making his oppostion look stupid than having an honest chat, otherwise we would be seeing the &#8220;you suck, I rock&#8221; kinda crap that Hapa seems to carefully avoid.</p>
<p>Yeah, I gotta give you kudos, Hapa.  For all the heat you take, you remain a gentleman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by gavind21</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>gavind21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>Hapa came.  Hapa wrote.  Hapa conquered.  'Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hapa came.  Hapa wrote.  Hapa conquered.  &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by Watchman</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>@ Hapa: There's no moral obligation to extend tolerance to *intolerance*, remember. (Philospohically this "goes meta" and starts chasing its tail pretty fast, but it's straightforward enough IRL.) To describe the issue in exaggerated caricatures, the "conservatives" want to tell people how they can and can't live their lives; while the "liberals" are out to do away with obstacles to people living however they damn well please.
The incompatibility should be fairly obvious.
Not that, of course, there was any shortage of dumbshits who miss the point and just can't stand opposite views in the "liberal" camp either, but that's people for you.

As for "intellectual honesty", pfft. The "conservative" position falls apart from the start there in the issue of "freedom" they so commonly purport to stand for, given that it de facto translates to "freedom to conform to our reactionary norms". (For some reason flag-saluting and scripture-thumping is wont to be involved.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Hapa: There&#8217;s no moral obligation to extend tolerance to *intolerance*, remember. (Philospohically this &#8220;goes meta&#8221; and starts chasing its tail pretty fast, but it&#8217;s straightforward enough IRL.) To describe the issue in exaggerated caricatures, the &#8220;conservatives&#8221; want to tell people how they can and can&#8217;t live their lives; while the &#8220;liberals&#8221; are out to do away with obstacles to people living however they damn well please.<br />
The incompatibility should be fairly obvious.<br />
Not that, of course, there was any shortage of dumbshits who miss the point and just can&#8217;t stand opposite views in the &#8220;liberal&#8221; camp either, but that&#8217;s people for you.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;intellectual honesty&#8221;, pfft. The &#8220;conservative&#8221; position falls apart from the start there in the issue of &#8220;freedom&#8221; they so commonly purport to stand for, given that it de facto translates to &#8220;freedom to conform to our reactionary norms&#8221;. (For some reason flag-saluting and scripture-thumping is wont to be involved.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by Count Casimir Wnuk</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4133</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Casimir Wnuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4133</guid>
		<description>I like this strip! As a card-carrying Democrat (radical wing) and as a believer in God, I don't fit in with the Don stereotype, but every once in a while I read this and think "Touche!" We radicals are often as close-minded as anyone else, and loath to admit it, so I have to agree with Hapajap on his point just above--however, the "Kent" character is always reasonable in this--I'd like to see the satire spread around more--that would raise this strip to a classic satiric comic ala "Li'l Abner" or "Pogo. " Seriously, the potential is there. As it is, it's too obviously partisan to be classic. I still dig it, though--especially as I'm a real leftie! It forces me to look at myself and sometimes laugh at my own folly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this strip! As a card-carrying Democrat (radical wing) and as a believer in God, I don&#8217;t fit in with the Don stereotype, but every once in a while I read this and think &#8220;Touche!&#8221; We radicals are often as close-minded as anyone else, and loath to admit it, so I have to agree with Hapajap on his point just above&#8211;however, the &#8220;Kent&#8221; character is always reasonable in this&#8211;I&#8217;d like to see the satire spread around more&#8211;that would raise this strip to a classic satiric comic ala &#8220;Li&#8217;l Abner&#8221; or &#8220;Pogo. &#8221; Seriously, the potential is there. As it is, it&#8217;s too obviously partisan to be classic. I still dig it, though&#8211;especially as I&#8217;m a real leftie! It forces me to look at myself and sometimes laugh at my own folly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by foundfriend</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>foundfriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>i am thankful for the people i consider friends dont need to create controversy over something that is meant to bring people together and are thankful for the people who make others that make them feel like they matter in this world. they dont bicker with big words to disguise how mindless the arguing really is unless its respectful debate like hapajap and some others, but if you look at the big picture its really not worth getting angry over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am thankful for the people i consider friends dont need to create controversy over something that is meant to bring people together and are thankful for the people who make others that make them feel like they matter in this world. they dont bicker with big words to disguise how mindless the arguing really is unless its respectful debate like hapajap and some others, but if you look at the big picture its really not worth getting angry over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by Hapajap</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapajap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>I think the history of the Americas can be summed up pretty easily:  It wasn't as egregious as the white-hating left-wing whack-jobs say it was, and it wasn't as benign as the super-nationalist right-wing nut-balls say it was.  Fair to say it was somewhere in between, and that taken in a modern-day context, rather than a 'what would you have done at the time' context, it was a crap-fest for the indigenous peoples of both continents.  Yes, there were good guys and bad guys on both sides.  

The point is that Thanksgiving is supposed to be a holiday that is beyond all that.  It's not about the dark and horrid parts of our history, nobody celebrates those.  It's about a bright point, and a symbolic gesture of hope and peace.

Watchman, as for the 'open-minded' issue, I think the point there isn't that both sides aren't closed minded, it's that Conservatives don't generally PRETEND to be otherwise.  We usually admit that we have our minds made up about a subject, and it takes some deal of convincin' to change our minds.  Liberals obviously PRETEND to be, as much so that it has become a mantra 'open minded and tolerant', but clearly aren't so with anything with which they disagree.  One side is at least intellectually honest about being closed minded.  Which doesn't play well on TV (ala Ann Coulter et al), but at least it's honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the history of the Americas can be summed up pretty easily:  It wasn&#8217;t as egregious as the white-hating left-wing whack-jobs say it was, and it wasn&#8217;t as benign as the super-nationalist right-wing nut-balls say it was.  Fair to say it was somewhere in between, and that taken in a modern-day context, rather than a &#8216;what would you have done at the time&#8217; context, it was a crap-fest for the indigenous peoples of both continents.  Yes, there were good guys and bad guys on both sides.  </p>
<p>The point is that Thanksgiving is supposed to be a holiday that is beyond all that.  It&#8217;s not about the dark and horrid parts of our history, nobody celebrates those.  It&#8217;s about a bright point, and a symbolic gesture of hope and peace.</p>
<p>Watchman, as for the &#8216;open-minded&#8217; issue, I think the point there isn&#8217;t that both sides aren&#8217;t closed minded, it&#8217;s that Conservatives don&#8217;t generally PRETEND to be otherwise.  We usually admit that we have our minds made up about a subject, and it takes some deal of convincin&#8217; to change our minds.  Liberals obviously PRETEND to be, as much so that it has become a mantra &#8216;open minded and tolerant&#8217;, but clearly aren&#8217;t so with anything with which they disagree.  One side is at least intellectually honest about being closed minded.  Which doesn&#8217;t play well on TV (ala Ann Coulter et al), but at least it&#8217;s honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by Watchman</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>I take it you didn't do as I recommended and follow the link as well as the discussion therein, then, seeing as how I addressed that very detail back then ?
*sigh*
Some people.

Okay, get this straight: *where* do contagious diseases do the most damage ? In densely populated areas, that's where. Like, say, the highly organised agricultural civilisations of South and Central Americas with their teeming cities and extensive internal communications infrastructure.
Not so much in sparser regions of small village-sized communities. Like the North American continent for the most part was (although as mentioned I'm under the impression demographic damage from the plagues was the direct cause of several regional proto-urban societies collapsing back to less sophisticated ecological patterns before "white" explorers even reached them).

The point being, the overwhelming majority of deaths by disease happened in the populous parts of the New World, ie. the middle and the south - already because there simply was *far* more people there to begin with. And yet to this day - again as already mentioned - people of native descent, be it now mixed or "purebred", form a sizeable chunk of the Latin American demographics.

And as much damage as the Eurasian and African germ pools now did to the North Americans, there was still no particular shortage of tribes getting pissed off at the territorial encroachement of the "white" settlers either before or long after the American Revolution. Not in the least, one imagines, partly because human populations rarely if ever actually get completely obliterated by diseases - the decimation may be quite horrifying, but all but inevitably enough folks will survive and develop resistance and pass it on to their descendants.
Microbes are actually pretty shitty at long-term population control you know.

By the 1800s, when US land-grabbing really got afoot, the natives had been exposed to the lethal alien epidemics for two-three centuries already; yet there still wasn't any lack of native obstacles to "white" territorial expansion.
As much good as it now did them.

Face it: the US method for dealing with such Untermencsh savages getting in the way of its glorious Drang nach Westen expansion - "Manifest Destiny", wasn't it? - was by and large summary extermination, or at best confinement in the squalid misery of barely ecologically viable tiny reservations.
Which, besides the fact there weren't nearly as many of them around even before Columbus, goes a long way to explaining why the survivors of the Northern indigenous populaces aren't much of a demographic presence unlike their southern cousins.

And I'm pretty sure I've typed most of the above before.

"...true mantra of the left is to be open minded about anything in the word –so long as they agree with it."
Oh cry me a river. Like the "Right" was any better - usually it's much worse actually. After all, something of an universal hallmark of the "conservative" mindset is unwillingness to tolerate ways of life that do not conform to their  generally rather narrow and strict norms (ie. differ from theirs), no?
And don't make me dig up Ann Coulter and the rest of the nutjobs to prove the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it you didn&#8217;t do as I recommended and follow the link as well as the discussion therein, then, seeing as how I addressed that very detail back then ?<br />
*sigh*<br />
Some people.</p>
<p>Okay, get this straight: *where* do contagious diseases do the most damage ? In densely populated areas, that&#8217;s where. Like, say, the highly organised agricultural civilisations of South and Central Americas with their teeming cities and extensive internal communications infrastructure.<br />
Not so much in sparser regions of small village-sized communities. Like the North American continent for the most part was (although as mentioned I&#8217;m under the impression demographic damage from the plagues was the direct cause of several regional proto-urban societies collapsing back to less sophisticated ecological patterns before &#8220;white&#8221; explorers even reached them).</p>
<p>The point being, the overwhelming majority of deaths by disease happened in the populous parts of the New World, ie. the middle and the south - already because there simply was *far* more people there to begin with. And yet to this day - again as already mentioned - people of native descent, be it now mixed or &#8220;purebred&#8221;, form a sizeable chunk of the Latin American demographics.</p>
<p>And as much damage as the Eurasian and African germ pools now did to the North Americans, there was still no particular shortage of tribes getting pissed off at the territorial encroachement of the &#8220;white&#8221; settlers either before or long after the American Revolution. Not in the least, one imagines, partly because human populations rarely if ever actually get completely obliterated by diseases - the decimation may be quite horrifying, but all but inevitably enough folks will survive and develop resistance and pass it on to their descendants.<br />
Microbes are actually pretty shitty at long-term population control you know.</p>
<p>By the 1800s, when US land-grabbing really got afoot, the natives had been exposed to the lethal alien epidemics for two-three centuries already; yet there still wasn&#8217;t any lack of native obstacles to &#8220;white&#8221; territorial expansion.<br />
As much good as it now did them.</p>
<p>Face it: the US method for dealing with such Untermencsh savages getting in the way of its glorious Drang nach Westen expansion - &#8220;Manifest Destiny&#8221;, wasn&#8217;t it? - was by and large summary extermination, or at best confinement in the squalid misery of barely ecologically viable tiny reservations.<br />
Which, besides the fact there weren&#8217;t nearly as many of them around even before Columbus, goes a long way to explaining why the survivors of the Northern indigenous populaces aren&#8217;t much of a demographic presence unlike their southern cousins.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve typed most of the above before.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;true mantra of the left is to be open minded about anything in the word –so long as they agree with it.&#8221;<br />
Oh cry me a river. Like the &#8220;Right&#8221; was any better - usually it&#8217;s much worse actually. After all, something of an universal hallmark of the &#8220;conservative&#8221; mindset is unwillingness to tolerate ways of life that do not conform to their  generally rather narrow and strict norms (ie. differ from theirs), no?<br />
And don&#8217;t make me dig up Ann Coulter and the rest of the nutjobs to prove the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks by KarateCowboy</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>KarateCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/28/thanks/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>"Get back go Stormfront"?  OK, whatever that means.
Anyways, if you read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples#Depopulation_from_disease
my assertion stands pretty well backed up.  The overwhelming majority of deaths caused by the movement of Africans and Europeans into the Americas was caused by disease, much of which did its lethal work before settlers even approached the tribes.

Either way, it is typical that self-hating whites and anti-white racists take the positive things we have like Thanksgiving and turn it into a racial hate-fest.

You know, the vitriolic reactions to Hapajap's RLC comics show that the true mantra of the left is to be open minded about anything in the word --so long as they agree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Get back go Stormfront&#8221;?  OK, whatever that means.<br />
Anyways, if you read this:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples#Depopulation_from_disease" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples#Depopulation_from_disease</a><br />
my assertion stands pretty well backed up.  The overwhelming majority of deaths caused by the movement of Africans and Europeans into the Americas was caused by disease, much of which did its lethal work before settlers even approached the tribes.</p>
<p>Either way, it is typical that self-hating whites and anti-white racists take the positive things we have like Thanksgiving and turn it into a racial hate-fest.</p>
<p>You know, the vitriolic reactions to Hapajap&#8217;s RLC comics show that the true mantra of the left is to be open minded about anything in the word &#8211;so long as they agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fundraiser Part 2 by Hapajap</title>
		<link>http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/24/fundraiser-part-2/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapajap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicstripclub.com/2008/11/24/fundraiser-part-2/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>I *am* an artist, I don't *purport* to be one.  It's pretty obvious from the fact that I DRAW this strip.

That I'm not an *artiste* who has his own head up his ass and has to make every single image a unique original... well, that just means I've got other things to do.  Like things that pay the bills.  

And again, if you don't like it, LEAVE.  No one is forcing you to come here and read my drivel and look at my horrible 'clip-art', now are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *am* an artist, I don&#8217;t *purport* to be one.  It&#8217;s pretty obvious from the fact that I DRAW this strip.</p>
<p>That I&#8217;m not an *artiste* who has his own head up his ass and has to make every single image a unique original&#8230; well, that just means I&#8217;ve got other things to do.  Like things that pay the bills.  </p>
<p>And again, if you don&#8217;t like it, LEAVE.  No one is forcing you to come here and read my drivel and look at my horrible &#8216;clip-art&#8217;, now are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
