Obama has said more troops should be sent to Afghanistan:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ibEL2evo0W2dcirDt4LR2VRyBQXA

In the capital-C Communist Party of the Soviet Union from the late ’70s through the ’80s, the Communist leadership deployed an increasing number of troops to Afghanistan:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

Therefore, a specific, factual Obama policy is, in fact, identical to a specific, factual Soviet Communist policy. (Although it has nothing to do with small-c “communism” as an ideology.)

All you’d've had to do would be to have said that, and you’d be $30 richer right now, Hapa. You didn’t. You’ve got nothing else. And from here on out, if you want to earn the money, you’re going to have to demonstrate a clear grasp of small-c communism as a political and economic ideology.

Just admit the cider’s starting to stain your shoulder already and move on with your life.

I win.

Though I may take you up on the rest some time.

I will say this much: By the terms I laid out, there is ONE THING that if you were to state it and present it accurately would cost me $30.

You will never list it, and my money is safe. But hey. Prove me wrong, why don’tcha? I know you could use the money.

Wow. I am so going to keep my $300. I was going to list the fallacies from the Wikipedia list you have used JUST IN THIS PARAGRAPH, but then I realized I’d bore you with big words you don’t know the meaning of. Besides, it’s literally easier to list the fallacies I can’t specifically see you have in that comment. Those would be… the conjunction fallacy; if-by-whiskey; the homunculus fallacy; the masked man fallacy; the naturalistic fallacy; the nirvana fallacy; any of the formal syllogistic fallacies per se. Those are just the formal fallacies. I’m not bothering going through the informal ones, but it doesn’t look good just at a glance.

“And in 60 days, he’s steered our grand ol’ ship of state more toward that goal than any other president in history.”

Toward what goal? Toward communism? Wow. You… you REALLY have no idea what communism is, do you?

*sigh* Okay. Fair enough. You won’t write a 3,000-word essay for $300. So write ONE factually correct, non-fallacious sentence as to ONE THING Barack Obama has done in his first two months that is communist – that actually fits the definition of communism – and I’ll pay you $30. How’s that for a deal?

You just have to produce ONE THING that is communist. You don’t even have to prove it’s MORE communist than any president in U.S. history. It just has to be small-C “communist.” ONE THING that fits the actual definition of communism that Barack Obama has said, done or said should be done.

In fact, $30 PER ITEM that you list that he’s done that is, in fact, communist. Name 3, get $90. Name 10, get your $300, and you don’t have to even spend 3,000 words on it!

NOT what somebody else has done. NOT what his mother, wife, best friend, barber or first grade teacher said.

FOR EVERY SINGLE THING Barack Hussein Obama, the 44th President of the United States, has done since January 20th, 2009 that adheres to the political ideology called “communism,” you get $30 if you can name it.

HAPAJAP, YOU SIMPLY CAN’T TURN DOWN THIS FANTASTIC OFFER!

“Of course, you’ll probably be happy with his new world order. You’ve already drown in the Kool Aid.”

How can you drown in poison Kool-Aid you’re supposed to drink to…? Oh, I see. You have no idea what the phrase “drink the Kool-Aid” means, either.

You’ve got cider in your other ear now, Hapajap.

Sure, he softens his rhetoric when he can remember too, but it still slips out every once in a while what his true intentions are. And in 60 days, he’s steered our grand ol’ ship of state more toward that goal than any other president in history. And that is beyond dispute. TWO MONTHS, he’s done this much damage. Just imagine what TWO YEARS will bring.

Of course, you’ll probably be happy with his new world order. You’ve already drown in the Kool Aid.

What I have implied and will say – because it’s objectively true – is that Kennedy’s political ideology was and is to the LEFT of Obama’s (to the left, not “more communist”), and the Democratic Party (and indeed, the Republican Party) of 1960 was and is to the LEFT of its 2008/2009 counterpart.

But hey. If you think I’m wrong, instead of saying it over and over again in hopes that it will eventually become true, prove it. If you can do that, I’ll do for you what certain comics publishers won’t do – give you money.

(Edit what you want. I don’t care.)

Check this one out. Kinda creeps me out.